|
|
Nachrichtenarchiv Thailand
Thaksin dissolves his last claim to credibility
Februar 26, 2006 - Source: The Nation
It was another desperate wriggle out of a tight spot for an embattled Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra when he decided
to dissolve the House of Representatives for a snap general election on April 2.
Certainly he needs a break from the intolerable pressure born from the widespread public outrage against his corruption-ridden government.
This follows his repeated insistence that he would not dissolve the House or resign to accommodate the demands of a broad-based, pro-democracy movement made up of many different groups and representing people from all walks of life.
The House dissolution, which is regarded as a tricky strategy to buy more time, is expected to fire up the determination of the movement seeking to evict him from office. He will be the target of severe verbal attacks during the rally scheduled for this afternoon at Sanam Luang.
The movement foresaw that Thaksin would opt for this game plan in order to take some of the fizz out of the rally. Leaders issued a statement saying that only Thaksin's resignation was acceptable, and denouncing his decision to dissolve the House as a devious trick to gain the upper hand in the polls.
"I will not dissolve the House, for it would be a betrayal of those 19 million people who voted for me." It proves again that Thaksin cannot be seriously taken as a man of his word. The boast was eventually revealed as just another falsehood.
Thaksin did not look perturbed in the least by the public's perception that he can never be expected to be sincere and honest in his statements. The House dissolution was clearly a betrayal of the public in order to allow him to save his own neck.
Appearing on TV and radio programmes to explain the decision, he was the same old Thaksin who blamed everyone but himself for the political troubles he and his family had endured all these months due to allegations of big-time corruption and other misdeeds.
It is truly unfortunate that Thailand must bear with a national leader who frequently goes back on his word without blinking an eye. He proves that people stand ready to believe bigger and bolder lies as long as these falsehoods are presented with audacity and shamelessness.
During the past two months, Thaksin has used this kind of erratic behaviour to survive growing political adversity and threats to his premiership due to his corroding credibility and public image. The sale of Shin Corp stocks, owned by his family members, has enabled the public to see his true colours and dispel all illusions.
Thaksin has become a politician with a businessman's instinct for survival. As part of the effort, he resorted to selling his business empire together with concession rights for TV broadcasting, a mobile phone network and four satellites to a Singapore government-owned fund.
The promise to come clean and tell us all about the Shin Corp deal during a special joint session of Parliament proposed for next week served as a temporary diversion. It will never happen now that the House was dissolved.
The Shin Corp deal enabled the people to comprehend the true definition and reality of how a man can betray his motherland.
At least Thaksin must feel his self-inflicted predicament to the degree that his friends have become his enemies. The last to do so was a mentor and former patron, Maj-General Chamlong Srimuang, who has now joined the movement to oust him.
The passionate plea for public understanding on Friday night and yesterday morning was aimed at rural grassroots voters who can expect a flood of cash from now until the election. In the same pitch he sought sympathy and support, fingering the pro-democracy movement as the main cause for all of his misfortunes.
Once behind a microphone, Thaksin has always been excellent with his snake-oil salesman's talent for the soft sale. The spin, although superb, was only effective in inspiring more public wrath against him.
Thaksin's Thai Rak Thai Party will likely win the general election, but not by as big a margin as last time, if it takes place at all. From now on, the anti-Thaksin movements will pile more pressure on him to leave politics, and the country, for good.
It depends on how long the movement can keep up the momentum and fan the fire of public opposition to Thaksin, especially in the provinces.
Whether he wins or loses, Thaksin appears ruined as far as his credibility and public image are concerned after going back on his word a countless number of times. He will never be regarded as a national leader who can be trusted for his integrity and honesty after the Shin Corp deal and previous corruption scandals.
With a heated election campaign in the offing, people can expect more sugar-coated lies from power-hungry, self-serving politicians who prey on naive and gullible voters, as they fight for spots in the House and opportunities to enrich themselves from ill-gotten gains and taxpayers' money.
Thaksin blaming "all but himself"
PM accused of "instigating hatred" with "ill-mannered distortion of the facts", failure to take responsibility for conflict.
Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's announcement of a House dissolution drew heavy fire from political scientists and analysts, who described it as "one-sided and unfair", "instigating hatred and socially divisiveness" and even an "ill-mannered distortion of the facts".
Thaksin's explanation blamed everybody but himself for the escalating political confrontation that led to the dissolution, law lecturer Somchai Preechasilpakul of Chiang Mai University pointed out.
"The statement is ill-mannered because it is one-sided and a distortion of the facts," Somchai said. "Thaksin passes all the blame on to other people. He fails to accept that the conflict is all about his leadership. He did not address any question the country has raised as to his legitimacy."
The PM's Office statement announcing the move speculated that dissatisfaction with Thaksin's leadership on the part of "some dissenting parties" and their planned mass rally today would lead to "violent confrontation between opponents and supporters of the premier". It also accused the protesters as well as some senators and members of Parliament of not playing by democratic rules.
The statement not only reflected his usual arrogance but sent a divisive message of hatred to the nation, said political scientist Surat Horachaikul of Chulalongkorn University, setting his opponents and supporters at each others' throats.
"House dissolution is just another time-buying tactic by Thaksin, but [by it] he is sowing hatred and division among the people," he said.
Thaksin's assertion on Friday that he "can't stand it when mob rule tries to override the law" reflected his shallow understanding of democracy, Somchai added. Peaceful rallies of citizens to demonstrate their frustration are a prominent element of democracy, he said.
"For Thaksin democracy is simply elections," Somchai said. "If he really believes this is mob rule, why is he running away from it [by dissolving the House]? Why won't he stay and fight it? The fact that he's shying away means he accepts that the people's protests are legitimate. Now he wants to whitewash himself with another election."
Dr Puangthong Pawakapan of Chulalongkorn University's Political Science Faculty agreed the statement was "unfair" because it contained not a single word of honest explanation at to why tens of thousands of people were attending public rallies against the government in the first place.
The political scientists added that if there were indeed riots or clashes during the public protest against the government, Thaksin would be half to blame because it would be his people mobilising government supporters to challenge its opponents.
Puangthong agreed with Somchai that the coming election was Thaksin's attempt to whitewash himself in the face of public accusations.
"The rallies and all the probes have tainted the credibility of the '19 million' [the number of people who voted for him last year]," Puangthong said. "Now Thaksin calls for a snap election because he needs a new number."
Many analysts say the election will see Thaksin returned to power, but even if he returns with 50 million votes, those votes will not answer all the doubts about him, said Surat of Chulalongkorn.
"Those votes would not be an amnesty for him. He needs to stay away from politics and face investigation," he said.
Election watchdog Poll Watch Foundation for Democracy yesterday warned that Thailand might see the "greatest" vote-buying in its recent history because of the government's desperation to return to power.
Historian Thammrongsak Petchlertanan noted a precedent in Thai political history for an illegitimate leader seeking legitimacy by the ballot box and ending up facing political turmoil in office because of public mistrust.
He cited Field Marshal Pibulsongkram's 1957 "dirty election" to legitimise his rise to the premiership by military coup.
"Field Marshal Pibul won his dubious election only to face several rounds of protest by students and mounting political crises. Sanam Luang was their protest ground too. He was ousted six months later by a military coup led by his subordinate Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat."
(Source: The Nation)
Copyright 2007 © Thai Apple. All rights reserved.
|